Nephilim: Angels cannot make babies!
Genesis 6, verse 2 ''the sons of God seeing the daughters of men, that they were fair, took to themselves wives of all which they chose''.
The Sons of God are not angels!
Epistle to the Hebrews 1:5
For to which of the angels did God ever say:
“You are my son; this day I have begotten you”?
Or again:
“I will be a father to him, and he shall be a son to me”?
---------------------
Sons of God= Not angels= Men= Adam & Eve and their children= Us.
---
Event B = Daughters of men= Monsters created by men are breeding with men, the result is visible in the skulls classified as Homo Ergaster, Homo Erectus, etc.= Recent history.
---
Implied Event A= Men impregnating female monkeys= Creation of monsters.
---
Verse 4, not the exact same event described in verse 2!
Event C = Genesis 6 verse 4 Now, giants were upon the earth in those days. For after the sons of God went into the daughters of men, and they brought forth children, these are the mighty men of old, men of renown.
---
Here is the solution: Event C= For a third time there's sinful breeding (1. Men with female monkeys 2. Men with female monsters 3. Men with the female offspring of female monsters).
The result of Event C is oversized, powerful monsters, looking more like men than like apes. Their (recent) bones are (wrongly) classified as Homo Neanderthalensis and Homo Denisova (my picture of the 3 skulls).
They were probably used for fighting and for hard work (moving big stones), and maybe some of them were living into the wild.
This text is an answer to @FilipekK K and the video Biblical story of the Nephilim and consequences of…
The video starts well, but then they wrongly put the angels in their interpretation.
Then, they say that all humanity was corrupted, instead, let's say that ape DNA was a danger for God's plan and His creation because the monsters didn't have eternal souls, and God could not allow them to cancel the spiritual existence of Men.
---
It seems that my text is not clear, so I will add these two comments:
Maria Lylyander
So monkeys are the daughters of men?
Adrien
We are the sons and daughters of God.
Men performing bestiality with female monkeys, generated a first kind of ''daughters of men''(monsters number 1) they are not daughters of God, and they only exist because of the will of men, opposed to the Will of God.
They (monsters number 1) are mentioned in Genesis 6:2.
With them, men are creating a second type of monsters, monsters number 2. This last event is the one described in Genesis 6:2.
Then in Genesis 6:4 a 3ʳᵈ kind of monsters (monsters number 3) are made by a new round of breeding between men and female monsters number 2.
@Strong and Steadfast @frawley @giveusthisday @Jeffrey Ade @andrew24157
The Sons of God are not angels!
Epistle to the Hebrews 1:5
For to which of the angels did God ever say:
“You are my son; this day I have begotten you”?
Or again:
“I will be a father to him, and he shall be a son to me”?
---------------------
Sons of God= Not angels= Men= Adam & Eve and their children= Us.
---
Event B = Daughters of men= Monsters created by men are breeding with men, the result is visible in the skulls classified as Homo Ergaster, Homo Erectus, etc.= Recent history.
---
Implied Event A= Men impregnating female monkeys= Creation of monsters.
---
Verse 4, not the exact same event described in verse 2!
Event C = Genesis 6 verse 4 Now, giants were upon the earth in those days. For after the sons of God went into the daughters of men, and they brought forth children, these are the mighty men of old, men of renown.
---
Here is the solution: Event C= For a third time there's sinful breeding (1. Men with female monkeys 2. Men with female monsters 3. Men with the female offspring of female monsters).
The result of Event C is oversized, powerful monsters, looking more like men than like apes. Their (recent) bones are (wrongly) classified as Homo Neanderthalensis and Homo Denisova (my picture of the 3 skulls).
They were probably used for fighting and for hard work (moving big stones), and maybe some of them were living into the wild.
This text is an answer to @FilipekK K and the video Biblical story of the Nephilim and consequences of…
The video starts well, but then they wrongly put the angels in their interpretation.
Then, they say that all humanity was corrupted, instead, let's say that ape DNA was a danger for God's plan and His creation because the monsters didn't have eternal souls, and God could not allow them to cancel the spiritual existence of Men.
---
It seems that my text is not clear, so I will add these two comments:
Maria Lylyander
So monkeys are the daughters of men?
Adrien
We are the sons and daughters of God.
Men performing bestiality with female monkeys, generated a first kind of ''daughters of men''(monsters number 1) they are not daughters of God, and they only exist because of the will of men, opposed to the Will of God.
They (monsters number 1) are mentioned in Genesis 6:2.
With them, men are creating a second type of monsters, monsters number 2. This last event is the one described in Genesis 6:2.
Then in Genesis 6:4 a 3ʳᵈ kind of monsters (monsters number 3) are made by a new round of breeding between men and female monsters number 2.
@Strong and Steadfast @frawley @giveusthisday @Jeffrey Ade @andrew24157